Email: support@essaywriterpros.com
Call Us: US - +1 845 478 5244 | UK - +44 20 7193 7850 | AUS - +61 2 8005 4826

data stewardship and protection

Weight gain in the freshman year of college is a documented phenomenon, but parents are morally less responsible for their adult children and less entitled to monitor. (9) And even if hubby is chubby, his spouse should find other ways to encourage better food selections. If the technology were in place to allow for spying on spouses as they worked or traveled, nonconsenting adults are generally off limits for the paternalism I am defending. A moral bias against paternalistically spying on adults follows from widely shared premises of adult moral autonomy. I can imagine two situations, though, when spying on other adults would be warranted. One is when spying has been solicited–that is, the spying is consensual. For example, your intimate friend says: here is a key to my apartment; come by unannounced and go through my things whenever you can to make sure there’s no sign I am backsliding on my commitment to give up substance abuse. Another example is when a helpless adult for whom you are responsible suffers from a mental illness or a disorder like Alzheimer’s and needs to be monitored for their own safety and good. Spying to make sure the bills are getting paid, and the doors are getting locked is an act of love and affection. The example McCloskey used three decades ago to defend his belief that spying on minors is acceptable reflects the moral preoccupations of another, patriarchal era: the sexual seduction of young daughters by older men. Reconsidering the example exposes the normative complexity of the case for parental spying, and indeed all spying aimed at protecting persons from harm. We want our safety and well-being. However, what constitutes safety and wellbeing is highly contestable and evolves over time. And what extremes of spying behavior are deemed ethically acceptable to achieve protective goals is also contestable and subject to evolving standards. McCloskey argued that minors can be protected from their own immature acts. Using the same example, he argued that legal wrongdoers, including seducers,